Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Dravidians Vs Devanagri

Is Tamil Nadu against Hindi? This is a very old debate, older than me in fact, so I was a tad bit surprised when it resurfaced among contemporary people. I am no advocate of insularity or `cultural preservation'. But I do think that insularity is a rather unfair charge being laid on Chennai today; it may have been true some thirty years ago.

The English always claim that the French are insular in protecting their language and indeed I have faced immigration officials or airline people insisting on speaking in French, which made me feel rather indignant. Even in admittedly insular France, I have come across friendly people who spoke English (This might have been a reaction to my French, but nevertheless...) But I don't think that is what Chennai is. I haven't seen people insisting that others speak in Tamil; if they don't speak in English or Hindi, it is because of a lack in education rather than any insularity.

So we come back to the point that if only Hindi was taught in schools in Tamil Nadu, this situation wouldn't arise. Well, in reality all private schools across the state offer Hindi, Sanskrit,French or Tamil as a second language . Most students prefer Sanskrit or French where it is easy to score marks, in fact Tamil is the least preferred language. When it comes to Government schools, however, Tamil is the only second language. But is that very different from say Gujarat or Karnataka? It is only the city schools which teach Hindi in Karnataka. I do know that Gujarat Government schools have Gujarati as the primary language with Hindi as the second language, whereas TN and Karnataka opt for English as the second language. If TN were to opt for Tamil and Hindi as the two languages of learning, there would be a huge hue and cry about its global insularity in excluding English!!!

Similarly as far as communication goes, one needs to learn the native tongue of a place be it Chennai or Ahmedabad, if one were to live there for a significant length of time. Besides being useful to communicate with people such as vendors, maids, milkmen etc, the local language is also a part of the culture of the place. If a UP-ite were to live in the US, would he/she baulk against learning English or would they not learn German living in Germany. So why is it so objectionable to learn Tamil living in Tamil Nadu? And vice-versa, Tamilians living in the North or West do not insist on speaking in English or Tamil, they do learn Hindi.

In practical terms, I have seen more Hindi being spoken in offices in Chennai (non-government ones) than in Mumbai. In fact, it is cool to know Hindi in Chennai, but not so in Ahmedabad or Bangalore or Mumbai. The government offices on the other hand, still have this age-old practice of learning one Hindi word a day and one can see this right from banks to registrar offices to railway stations. So where is Hindi being excluded?

Just because auto drivers and maids do not respond to Hindi, to brand Chennai as insular is rather unfair. Chennai is as insular as London or Frankfurt or Colombo and less insular than Paris. The crib about Dravidians being against Devanagri is outdated. So people, please realise that when you crib that Chennai-ites do not speak Hindi, it is you who are being insular and not the other way around.

Labels:

7 Comments:

At 10:03 PM, Blogger Usha said...

As a person who has stayed in Ahmedabad and in chennai and as a Tamilian fluent in Hindi, i beg to dis-agree.
Firstly, hindi is looked down upon even in Kendriya vidhyala or Central schools- where Hindi is the second language and Sanskrit third. There is a post-colonial hang-over that has created a bias for English.
Also it is enough to know hindi to live in ahmedabad.in fact my mother who only knew Tamil picked it up while our stay there to converse with milkmen, groceries, auto wallahs etc. However a lot of states in India are allies to the crime of promoting a regional language over Hindi.
I am not accusing Chennai of insulraity, its too simple a term for a complex national and state history to be summed up in one word. There is a lot of baggage with respect to acceptance of Hindi in non-Hindi speaking states in the South in particular.
And the divison of states according to language wasnt as easy and non-consequential as it was thought it would be.

 
At 5:25 PM, Blogger Anu said...

wow! Very nicely said..I know many people who have complained about the same thing to me, and I remember how agitated I used to get! Nice to see someone voicing the same thoughts and that too with such force and justification! :)

 
At 4:30 PM, Blogger penuryof thought said...

Anupama, thanks for adding weight to my side of the table:-).

Usha, the point I was trying to make is that since we in some sort of wisdom elected to divide ourselves geographically by language, it is rather unreasonable to expect that the regions should speak Hindi primarily. The same argument of Anglo-colonialism is what you expect of Hindi-colonialism, if you do enforce it over the natural mother tongue of people right? Just as your mom picked up Hindi at Ahmedabad, so will others pick up Tamil staying in Madras. I am not arguing that Tamil needs to be enforced in Gujarat. I am arguing that it is wrong to expect all classes of people to be conversant in Hindi, in a place where the local language is different.

 
At 9:38 AM, Blogger Ganesh said...

Anu;
You are right.Tamilians in Hyderabad too are not averse to learning Hindi or Telugu in the schools.In fact,it's other groups(Marathi or Gujarati or Hindi) who prefer Special english as 2nd lang. instead of Telugu.(Of course;now Special engl. is now removed.)But;it's nothing wrong in that,because you get more marks in Special english than In Telugu.
After all,one Tamilian(Maasti Iyengar) won Gyanpith award for his contrib. to Kannada litt.Moerover,it's Telugu people who watch more no. of Tamil films dubbed in Telugu;while Tamilians do watch a good number of Telugu or Hindi films.

 
At 5:18 AM, Blogger rajasekhar said...

It is very amusing that Hindi speaking population of India are getting so distressed beacuse Dravidian speaking southerns are elected to speak there own languages insted of Hindi.
Why southerns should learn and speak Hindi?. It is not a superior language than Dravidian, it is not older than Tamil or Kannada and it is not even totally Indian language either with immense influence of Persian, Arabic and Turkic.
If Hindi spekers wants us to speak there language, first learn some of our languages.
I want to take this oppertunity to thank my Tamilian brothers for saving southerners from northern dominence.

 
At 9:58 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Check out my blogs related to this language issue if you find time...

http://vetri-vel.blogspot.com/

I have many posts related to this language issue.

In fact the whole blog is dedicated to the anti hindi riots in 1965 and present scenario.

I try to present facts as much as possible with sources.

 
At 11:46 AM, Blogger penuryof thought said...

Vetri-vel,
Your website is loaded with a lot of data. i just want to make a small point here - I am actually for people learning Hindi or any other language for that matter. My issue is with people's expectations and lack of courtesy towards other languages. Thats all.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home